WorkMonitor for healthcare teams
Keep the clinical screen out of the record entirely
Back-office and support teams, where the assessor’s question is not what you captured. It is what you can prove you never captured at all, on a day you can name.
Free for two seats, no card.
Healthcare
What changes for a healthcare operation
Pick a line and the page it happens on opens on the right.
Rollout
Deploying where the screen itself is the risk
- 1
Deny-list the clinical estate first
Name the systems, and they are excluded before a frame is taken or a row is sent. A denied application produces no data at all, nothing to filter, nothing to breach.
- 2
Let the policy engine refuse the rest
Scope Sentinel blocks capture outside the configured scope, so an over-broad setting is refused rather than discovered in an audit.
- 3
Set retention to your own regime
Retention windows, erasure and subject-access handling are configured, not inherited. Indefinite retention is the default that causes the incident.
- 4
Keep a trail that survives inspection
A hash-chained audit log and a data-access record, so an access by an administrator leaves a mark that cannot be quietly removed.
A tool that captures everything vs. one that never sees it
workmonitor.vsMonitoring in a clinical setting today
The clinical screen
With WorkMonitor
Excluded on the device before capture. The frame is never taken.
Monitoring in a clinical setting today
Captured, then filtered in the viewer, so it was collected, stored, and available to leak.
Scope drift
With WorkMonitor
Refused at capture time by the policy engine, with the configuration change on the audit chain.
Monitoring in a clinical setting today
An administrator widens a setting, and it surfaces months later.
Retention
With WorkMonitor
Windows you set, with erasure and subject-access handling built in.
Monitoring in a clinical setting today
Whatever the vendor default was.
Who accessed a record
With WorkMonitor
A hash-chained data-access log, surfaced to the subject as well as the auditor.
Monitoring in a clinical setting today
Unknown, and unknowable after the fact.
Compliance claims
With WorkMonitor
A published gap list and controls that can be demonstrated. We do not claim certifications we do not hold.
Monitoring in a clinical setting today
A badge on a page standing in for a control.
Multi-site coverage
With WorkMonitor
Coverage per local day across sites, with alerts during the shift.
Monitoring in a clinical setting today
A rota per site and no shared picture.
What a healthcare operation gets to work with
- Consent management
- Employee transparency ("What We See")
- Capture controls / policy engine
- Scope Sentinel
Ask AI
Ask AI what was and was not captured
Answers drawn from the capture policy, the deny-list and the access chain.
Pick a question above and WorkMonitor AI will answer from your team's real numbers.
The status meeting, already written
Status is normally assembled by asking. Here it is already: hours, activity, attendance and risk on one board, for one person or the whole company. Set the thresholds once and it tells you who needs you.
Jobs to be done
The jobs a healthcare operation runs here
- Monitor legally & stay compliantVersioned consent, a capture scope that cannot quietly widen, retention and DSAR handling, and written guidance for 32 jurisdictions before you roll out in one.
- Capture screenshots on your termsA randomised cadence, exclusions applied on the device, retention that expires, and the consent record and appeal route that keep the programme standing.
- Catch insider threats earlyEgress signals, anomaly detection and integrity checks on a hash-chained trail that records the investigators too, so the finding survives being examined.
- Monitor apps & websitesEvery app and site classified, every day replayable as a timeline. You see which tools are eating the week and which teams they are fragmenting.
Where you operate
Where clinical monitoring is hardest to get right
- United States (federal)Federal law is permissive; the real constraints are state law and the NLRA.
- United KingdomThe ICO's 2023 monitoring guidance is the operative document, and it expects a DPIA.
- GermanyThe works council holds a veto, and a productivity dashboard is enough to trigger it.
- Canada (federal)Reasonableness is the statutory test, and the OPC applies a four-part necessity analysis.
- IllinoisBIPA carries a private right of action. This is the state where monitoring gets sued.
- IrelandThe DPC accepts a legitimate business interest, and then tests proportionality hard.
Straight answers
The questions we would ask in your position
Every answer here is the one you would get on a call. Open as many as you like; they stay open, so two can be held side by side.
No, and anyone telling you a monitoring tool is "HIPAA compliant" on its own is overselling. WorkMonitor holds no certifications at all. It is pre-launch, with SOC 2 and ISO 27001 in preparation. What it offers instead is the control set an assessment examines, published with source references and an open gap list: per-app deny-lists applied on-device, credential-derived tenant isolation enforced by database constraints, hash-chained audit of every access, and configurable retention. Whether your deployment meets your obligations is a question for your own assessment, and this is the honest ground to start it from.
By not collecting it. Per-app privacy deny-lists are enforced by the agent on the device, before transmission, so a named clinical application yields no screenshot, no window title, nothing. That is a stronger position than capturing and redacting, because there is no copy to leak.
That is what the policy record is for. It shows which deny-list and capture policy were in force on any given day and which version each person consented to, and the audit chain shows every access to what was captured. The absence is evidenced rather than asserted.
Back office, scheduling, billing, support and administration, the desk-based side. Clinical staff at the bedside are not the fit: the capture agents are desktop-first, covering macOS, Windows and Linux plus the browser.
Nearby
Teams with the same problem, from another angle
Take these with you
The software is the easy part of a rollout
Here is what we would send a manager doing one for the first time: how to read a productivity number, what to say to a remote team before anything is installed, and a policy you can adopt as written.
Point it at one team for a week.
Create the account, put the agent on a handful of desks, and leave it alone. On Friday you read the week instead of reconstructing it: hours against their projects, focus and idle per person, and the timesheets already filled in.
Free for two seats. No card, and no sales call to sit through.